ncdu: remove#536889
Conversation
|
What is the problem that is solved by removal, instead of treating the program as completed (if for unfortunate reasons) or waiting for a fork if there are necessary fixes? |
|
Maybe knownVulnerabilities would be better? Or just leaving it as is? |
| nats-streaming-server = throw "'nats-streaming-server' has been removed as critical bug fixes and security fixes will no longer be performed as of June of 2023"; # Added 2025-10-13 | ||
| ncdu_2 = throw "'ncdu_2' has been renamed to/replaced by 'ncdu'"; # Converted to throw 2025-10-27 | ||
| ncdu = throw "'ncdu' has been removed as it is unmaintained upstream"; # Converted to throw 2026-06-29 | ||
| ncdu_2 = throw "'ncdu_2' has been renamed to/replaced by 'ncdu', which has been removed"; # Converted to throw 2025-10-27 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| ncdu_2 = throw "'ncdu_2' has been renamed to/replaced by 'ncdu', which has been removed"; # Converted to throw 2025-10-27 | |
| ncdu_2 = throw "'ncdu_2' has been renamed to 'ncdu' as ncud_1 has been removed"; # Converted to throw 2025-10-27 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should we not keep ncdu_2?
Sure, this is better, I see now removal may be a bit extreme for a such a simple pkg. I would at least like there to be a note to users about this and maybe to point to alternatives like |
|
As the reporter of #536471, I would prefer this package to remain with a warning on attribute access. I strongly believe there would be a fork with a new maintainer of this package once this situation becomes more well-known. Thank you! |
|
Hello, I have fork here with Zig 0.16 support: https://github.com/BratishkaErik/ncdu You may want to try this for meantime (I tried to avoid any changes in NCDU release, except for new Zig version support and modernizing build logic) https://github.com/BratishkaErik/ncdu/releases/tag/v2.10.1-dev.10 or just grab patches from here if you don't trust: Some context: |
Thank you! |
Things done
Removed due to #536471.
Resolves #536471.
passthru.tests.nixpkgs-reviewon this PR. See nixpkgs-review usage../result/bin/.