-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 736
Improve context management of process tools #290
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ac33eca
Improve context managment of process, truncate outputs and allow offs…
wonderwhy-er 9ff639c
fix: length parameter now caps tail reads in process output pagination
wonderwhy-er 3355b68
fix: tail reads now properly respect length parameter and show accura…
wonderwhy-er c739f54
fix: getOutputSinceSnapshot now checks completedSessions as fallback
wonderwhy-er 450d1ab
Cleanup
wonderwhy-er File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggestion: The documentation for the process output tool incorrectly states that
offset=0always reads "NEW output since last read", but in the implementation this only holds for active sessions and not for completed sessions where repeatedoffset=0calls re-read from the beginning, which can lead callers to misuse the API and repeatedly stream the same output. [logic error]Severity Level: Minor⚠️
Why it matters? ⭐
This is a documentation correctness suggestion, not a code bug fix. The current comment in the tool description implies a guarantee that may not hold for completed sessions (many process-read implementations will return from start for finished processes or when there is no last-read cursor). Clarifying the text to "For running processes, read NEW output since last read (default behavior)" avoids misleading callers and reduces incorrect assumptions about API semantics. It's a safe, useful clarification that improves developer UX and prevents subtle misuse.
Prompt for AI Agent 🤖