Track extra_lifetime_params_map per-owner

[oli-obk]

Part of rust-lang/rust-project-goals#620

An easy one now that #156508 is merged, as there are no more cross-owner dependencies on this table

r? @petrochenkov

[oli-obk]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[rust-bors]

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: f6842f2 (f6842f23feea9fd663890d2ddce96c9e55cb3174)
Base parent: 5503df8 (5503df87342a73d0c29126a7e08dc9c1255c46ad)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (f6842f2): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

Benchmarking means the PR may be perf-sensitive. Consider adding rollup=never if this change is not fit for rolling up.

@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This perf run didn't have relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 0.5%, secondary 3.0%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.0%	[1.1%, 2.8%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	4.3%	[1.1%, 9.8%]	8
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.5%	[-2.5%, -2.5%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-7.8%	[-7.8%, -7.8%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.5%	[-2.5%, 2.8%]	3

Cycles

Results (primary 2.4%, secondary -4.4%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.4%	[2.4%, 2.4%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-4.4%	[-4.4%, -4.4%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	2.4%	[2.4%, 2.4%]	1

Binary size

This perf run didn't have relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 487.42s -> 489.163s (0.36%)
Artifact size: 389.91 MiB -> 389.89 MiB (-0.01%)

[petrochenkov]

Is it necessary to move the lifetime functions from LateResolutionVisitor to Resolver?
LateResolutionVisitor should have all the same access to Resolver as Resolver itself, so it should be possible.
These functions are only used during late resolution, so they are implemented on late resolver and live in late.rs.

Upd: alternatively they could be implemented on Resolver and just live in late.rs.

[rustbot]

This PR was rebased onto a different main commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed.

Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers.

[oli-obk]

Is it necessary to move the lifetime functions from LateResolutionVisitor to Resolver?

nope, not necessary. I removed that.

@rustbot ready