NO-ISSUE: Add fix TC 63866 failing in CI job - #6380
Conversation
|
Pipeline controller notification For optional jobs, comment This repository is configured in: LGTM mode |
WalkthroughThe test helper now unmounts Changesrpm-ostree replacement handling
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 15✅ Passed checks (15 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@test/extended-priv/node.go`:
- Line 1621: Update the command assembled by ReplaceRpmOstree so the chmod,
umount, and cp steps remain in a single && chain, preserving failures through
the final status. Handle only the expected “path already unmounted” result
explicitly, and propagate all other umount errors; do not suppress error
returns.
🪄 Autofix
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 8fe2a1fa-6891-4f2e-af78-40b093abb428
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
test/extended-priv/node.gotest/extended-priv/testdata/files/rpm-ostree-force-pivot-error.sh
d4de2a5 to
543dfae
Compare
|
Note GitHub couldn't provide a complete incremental comparison for this pull request, so CodeRabbit is performing a full review instead. This review may take a little longer. |
|
/test bootstrap-unit /lgtm |
|
Pipeline controller notification No second-stage tests were triggered for this PR. This can happen when:
Use |
|
/verified later by @ptalgulk01 |
|
@ptalgulk01: Only users can be targets for the DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: isabella-janssen, ptalgulk01, sergiordlr The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@ptalgulk01: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/verified later by @ptalgulk01 |
|
@ptalgulk01: Only users can be targets for the DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/verified later @ptalgulk01 |
|
@ptalgulk01: This PR has been marked to be verified later by DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@ptalgulk01: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Added fix for below failure
Summary by CodeRabbit