chore(openspec): rebind hifi row to the landed #507 squash - #524
Conversation
Same pattern as #482/#501/#512/#514: subject_commit pointed at the pre-squash branch commit (af60c29) which is not an ancestor of main after the #507 squash (4187102); PR CIs fail subject_not_ancestor until rebound. Local gates: machine-truth 24/0, metrics 13/0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for security reviews. Please try again later. |
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 23 minutes You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![codex-tri-adversarial-bot[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/311287868?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Codex Tri-Adversarial Bot
Automated tri-adversarial ship-gate (L0 terra triage / L1 tier-routed lens fanout / L2 refute-by-default / L3 sol apex — Codex models).
Mapped event: COMMENT
Codex Tri-Adversarial ship-gate — PR #524
- Repo head:
chore/rebind-hifi-row-507@6f1f3d8 - Base:
main@4187102 - Files changed: 1
- Engine: four-model tri-adversarial gate on Codex — L0 triage
gpt-5.6-terra/low; L1 lens finders routedgpt-5.6-terra/low →gpt-5.6-luna/medium →gpt-5.5/xhigh (security floorgpt-5.5); L2 refute-by-defaultgpt-5.5/xhigh, top-tier findings refuted bygpt-5.6-sol/xhigh (every refutation cross-model); L3 apexgpt-5.6-sol/max. 誠實聲明：層級與 Claude 三層 gate 同構（terra≈haiku、luna≈sonnet、gpt-5.5≈opus、sol≈fable），但模型池是 Codex 的，非 Anthropic 的。
Verdict
SHIP
- 阻擋門檻 severity:
critical, high - mapped GitHub event:
COMMENT - ℹ️ 判定為 SHIP，但刻意不送 APPROVE：GitHub App 的 approving review 不計入
required_approving_review_count（2026-07-31 實測）。本報告是證據，approving 那一票請由真人帳號投。
Difficulty & routing
- overall:
high(source: terra-triage) - lens tiers: correctness→
gpt-5.5, security→gpt-5.5, simplification→gpt-5.6-luna, test-gap→gpt-5.5
Layer stats
- L1: raw=1 deduped=1 finder_failures=0
- L2: confirmed=0 refuted=1 unverified=0
- L3 final: 0
Killed (did not survive L2/L3)
L1-TG-001[low] Ledger rebind changes validation target without a changed regression fixture — The diff corrects one ledger datum; it does not change validation logic. The trusted metadata confirms the newsubject_commitexactly equals the landedmainbase SHA (4187102...). Merely observing that no test file changed does not establish a test gap, especially since the finder did not insp
Summary
No actionable findings survived to L3. The PR therefore passes this final adjudication based on the supplied evidence, with no claim that the replacement commit’s ancestry was independently validated.
Agent calls
- 7/7 ok, engine wall-clock 305.8s
VERDICT
SHIP
VERDICT: SHIP
Summary
migrate-console-to-hifi-designledger row 的subject_commit指向 chore(openspec): align ship-cycle merge contract with lifecycle ancestry (#451) #504 squash 前的分支 commit（af60c29，squash 後非 main ancestor），會讓所有 openspec PR 的 machine-truth source observation 以subject_not_ancestor失敗。rebound 至 landed squash881f6da。AI Coding Governance
Machine values:
Change lane=F/B/G/S;Behavior contract changed=yes/no;Requirement source=issue/docs/plans/superpowers spec/existing contract/not applicable.Frontend Verification
User-facing changes must pass two independent producers: real frontend/runtime operability evidence and the pinned
docs/plans/design-system-reference.manifest.jsonfidelity gate. Scope is derived from changed paths plus the base/head manifest union; the PR body cannot select an easier screen.mixedandpartial_reference_missingpermit honest partial work but requireFull completion claimed = no. Semantic evidence is produced only by thedesign-semantic-visualCI Playwright job, never supplied as PR input;PR Metadata Contractvalidates the live PR metadata, while normal protected CI checks determine mergeability.Deploy Path Verification
Required for runtime / Docker / Kit / viewer / ports / env / conversion-service changes.
Self-Referential Bootstrap
Required when the PR changes the verification mechanism itself (deploy path / evidence harness / gate script). Rule:
docs/agents/self-referential-bootstrap.md. Open ledger debt inscripts/self-referential-bootstrap-ledger.jsonblocks further mechanism PRs until fixpoint closure.Validation
node --test scripts/tests/test-openspec-machine-truth.mjs→ 24 pass／0 fail。node --test scripts/tests/test-ai-coding-metrics.mjs→ 13 pass／0 fail。git diff --cached --check→ clean。Known Risks
🤖 Generated with Claude Code