fix: feat: add delegators view

[key1989han]

Closes #719

feat: add delegators view

/claim #719

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Added a delegators view, making delegator information available in the application.

[vercel]

@key1989han is attempting to deploy a commit to the Livepeer Foundation Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: d32a2662-065b-4638-85e3-99a1848178df

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 019650c and ff1805f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• fix.md

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds a fix.md entry for issue #719 describing the new delegators view.

Changes

Delegators view release note

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Add delegators view entry fix.md	Adds an issue header and feature description for the delegators view.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Suggested reviewers: ecwireless

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The description is too sparse and misses required sections like Type of Change, Changes Made, Testing, and Impact/Risk.	Expand the PR body to follow the template with those sections, plus a brief summary, testing notes, and risk/rollback details.
Linked Issues check	⚠️ Warning	The summarized change only updates fix.md, so it does not demonstrate the Delegators tab, route, queries, or gating required by #719.	Implement the Delegators view end-to-end per #719, including the tab, route, delegator list, pending rewards, pagination, and orchestrator-only access.

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title is concise and describes the feature change, even if the duplicated "fix: feat:" prefix is a bit noisy.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	No clearly out-of-scope changes are evident; the documented edit stays aligned with issue #719.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

Warning

⚠️ This pull request has been flagged as potential spam (other-spam) by CodeRabbit slop detection and should be reviewed carefully.