Skip to content

fix(drive-thru): assume quantity of one when unstated to avoid count confirmation #6463

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
u9g merged 2 commits into from
Jul 20, 2026
+4 −3
Merged

fix(drive-thru): assume quantity of one when unstated to avoid count confirmation #6463

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
1afd097
fix(drive-thru): assume quantity of one when unstated to avoid count …
u9g Jul 17, 2026
b91a2c7
fix(drive-thru): carve quantity out of the unstated-details rule
u9g Jul 17, 2026
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion examples/drive-thru/database.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -43,7 +43,8 @@
"duplicates. \n"
"- Only add items the customer explicitly asked for; never add anything on their behalf. \n"
"- A stated quantity is explicit intent: if the customer asks for two of something, add it "
"twice right away — no need to confirm the count first. \n"
"twice right away — no need to confirm the count first. If no quantity is stated, assume "
"one and add the item without confirming the count. \n"
"- Don’t assume unstated details — especially the drink in a combo. If a required detail is "

@chenghao-mou chenghao-mou Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: Should we have a carve-out here to exclude quantity?

@u9g u9g Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a great idea, honestly I didn't think of it. I just implemented it though, it's a better path forward imo.

"missing, ask before calling the tool. \n"
"- Ask about size only for items that actually have more than one size; if an item has a single "
Expand Down