-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
Batch validator catch-up via an aggregated MissingCrossChainUpdates error #6573
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
ma2bd
wants to merge
7
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
ma2bd/batch-cross-chain-updates-main
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0b9e30a
Batch validator catch-up on missing cross-chain bundles via an aggreg…
ma2bd 15fdc5f
Handle MissingCrossChainUpdates in one pass instead of incrementally …
ma2bd 1ccb335
Catch up missing cross-chain senders by sending only the needed block…
ma2bd b59ad54
Revert sparse validator catch-up to the contiguous sync; sparse push …
ma2bd 211074f
Add a regression test for catching up a lagging validator across a se…
ma2bd 8dada6f
Document that validator catch-up sends only locally-held certificates…
ma2bd 8a45eb7
Trim validator catch-up doc comments to the essentials.
ma2bd File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What could happen here is that a previous message from the same origin is "negative" in the inbox (due to a confirmed block consuming it). Currently, this older message is not reported as missing. (It would use more network data but could arguably make the work of [future] VM-free clients easier.)
Conversely, we are not trying to normalize the reported missing messages to include only the maximum height from each origin. (It would be a small optimization in line with the rest of the code)