Skip to content

feat(QTI): add associate interaction viewer (connect pairs) - #15151

Draft
habibayman wants to merge 17 commits into
learningequality:developfrom
habibayman:feat/qti-associate-match
Draft

feat(QTI): add associate interaction viewer (connect pairs)#15151
habibayman wants to merge 17 commits into
learningequality:developfrom
habibayman:feat/qti-associate-match

Conversation

@habibayman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@github-actions github-actions Bot added DEV: renderers HTML5 apps, videos, exercises, etc. APP: Device Re: Device App (content import/export, facility-syncing, user permissions, etc.) APP: Coach Re: Coach App (lessons, quizzes, groups, reports, etc.) DEV: frontend SIZE: very large labels Aug 5, 2026
@habibayman habibayman changed the title feat(QTI) feat(QTI): add associate interaction viewer (connect pairs) Aug 5, 2026
@learning-equality-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Hi @habibayman, thanks for contributing!

For the review process to begin, please verify that the following is satisfied:

  • Contribution is aligned with our contributing guidelines

  • Pull request description has correctly filled AI usage section & follows our AI guidance:

    AI guidance

    State explicitly whether you didn't use or used AI & how.

    If you used it, ensure that the PR is aligned with Using AI as well as our DEEP framework. DEEP asks you:

    • Disclose — Be open about when you've used AI for support.
    • Engage critically — Question what is generated. Review code for correctness and unnecessary complexity.
    • Edit — Review and refine AI output. Remove unnecessary code and verify it still works after your edits.
    • Process sharing — Explain how you used the AI so others can learn.

    Examples of good disclosures:

    "I used Claude Code to implement the component, prompting it to follow the pattern in ComponentX. I reviewed the generated code, removed unnecessary error handling, and verified the tests pass."

    "I brainstormed the approach with Gemini, then had it write failing tests for the feature. After reviewing the tests, I used Claude Code to generate the implementation. I refactored the output to reduce verbosity and ran the full test suite."

Also check that issue requirements are satisfied & you ran pre-commit locally.

Pull requests that don't follow the guidelines will be closed.

Reviewer assignment can take up to 2 weeks.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

APP: Coach Re: Coach App (lessons, quizzes, groups, reports, etc.) APP: Device Re: Device App (content import/export, facility-syncing, user permissions, etc.) DEV: frontend DEV: renderers HTML5 apps, videos, exercises, etc. SIZE: very large

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Product Issue: build QTI Associate (connect pairs) Interaction

1 participant