Skip to content

docs: clarify trace retention behavior#4837

Open
sineha-mani wants to merge 11 commits into
mainfrom
sineha/trace-retention-docs
Open

docs: clarify trace retention behavior#4837
sineha-mani wants to merge 11 commits into
mainfrom
sineha/trace-retention-docs

Conversation

@sineha-mani

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Clarify when feedback, evaluators, automation rules, and annotation queue operations can extend trace retention.
  • Update stale docs that said all annotation queue adds and multi-turn evaluators automatically upgrade traces.
  • Document that manual UI feedback/notes and manual annotation queue adds do not change retention by default, while SDK/API feedback may still extend retention unless opted out.

Test Plan

  • Docs-only change; reviewed rendered Markdown diff locally.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks for opening a docs PR, sineha-mani! When it's ready for review, please add the relevant reviewers:

  • @katmayb or @fjmorris (LangSmith)

@github-actions github-actions Bot added internal langsmith For docs changes to LangSmith labels Jul 10, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Mintlify preview branch generated: preview-sineha-1783732909-9486b1c

Site preview: https://langchain-5e9cc07a-preview-sineha-1783732909-9486b1c.mintlify.app

Important

Preview links may take a few minutes to start working while the deployment finishes.

Changed documentation pages (preview deep links):

Only the top 5 changed markdown files by diff size are listed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

internal langsmith For docs changes to LangSmith

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant