-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 217
fix(levm): charge the EIP-8250 first-use surcharge on the default-code approval #7085
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
AnkushinDaniil
wants to merge
3
commits into
lambdaclass:hegota-devnet
Choose a base branch
from
AnkushinDaniil:daniil/eip8250-first-use-default-code
base: hegota-devnet
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+70
−16
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9bc4891
fix(levm): charge the EIP-8250 first-use surcharge on the default-cod…
AnkushinDaniil 68a8461
fix(levm): roll back the approval context when the first-use surcharg…
AnkushinDaniil 67fde84
refactor(levm): derive the EIP-8250 nonce slot in one place and charg…
AnkushinDaniil File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This reimplements the slot derivation from
consume_keyed_noncescharacter-for-character - same[0u8; 64]preimage, same[12..32]/[32..64]layout, samekeccak_hash. Two copies of a consensus-critical derivation that must agree: if either drifts, the pre-check prices a different slot than the one actually consumed, and the default-code path charges a surcharge unrelated to what it did.Worth collapsing to one private helper, something like
fn keyed_nonce_slot(sender: Address, key: &U256) -> H256, called from both. Cheap now, and it makes the invariant structural instead of something a future edit has to remember.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Collapsed into
keyed_nonce_slot(sender, key), called from bothconsume_keyed_noncesandkeyed_nonce_first_use_surcharge.