Skip to content

fix(key-wallet-manager): lossless persistence event channel to stop the sync-watermark freeze - #924

Closed
bfoss765 wants to merge 14 commits into
dashpay:devfrom
bfoss765:fix/wallet-event-persistence-mpsc
Closed

fix(key-wallet-manager): lossless persistence event channel to stop the sync-watermark freeze#924
bfoss765 wants to merge 14 commits into
dashpay:devfrom
bfoss765:fix/wallet-event-persistence-mpsc

Conversation

@bfoss765

@bfoss765 bfoss765 commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

The wallet event bus is a single bounded tokio::broadcast ring (DEFAULT_WALLET_EVENT_CAPACITY = 1000), fanned out fire-and-forget from process_block.rs. It feeds two very different consumers:

  1. Incidental subscribers via subscribe_events() — dash-spv's EventHandler dispatch and the unit tests — for which a dropped event under overload is harmless.
  2. The platform durable-persistence consumer (dashpay/platform rs-platform-wallet), for which a dropped event is not harmless: dropped TransactionDetected/BlockProcessed rows never reach disk while the surviving SyncHeightAdvanced watermark keeps advancing, so the persisted sync height outruns the rows it implies. The platform #4069 guard then latches that wallet's watermark into a permanent freeze. In the field this presents as a mainnet sync that climbs, then "rolls back" to a stale height on every relaunch.

Under a heavy historical SPV catch-up a burst larger than the ring between consumer drains overflows it (RecvError::Lagged) and trips exactly that freeze. Batching the persistence stores (shipped separately on the platform side) raised the burst threshold, but a single lag still freezes forever.

Fix

Give the persistence consumer its own dedicated, unbounded tokio::mpsc channel carrying the same event stream, in the same order, with no drops — so it can never observe Lagged and its freeze guard never fires. The existing broadcast is kept unchanged for the incidental subscribers (no behavioural change for dash-spv or tests). All emission now flows through a single emit_event choke point that pushes to both channels in order.

Why unbounded rather than a bounded back-pressuring channel

Several emit sites run inside this manager's RwLock write guard (SPV block processing holds wallet.write().await across process_block_for_wallets), while the persistence consumer needs a read() lock on the same manager to project each event. A bounded send().await/blocking_send that parked under the write guard would deadlock the very consumer that must drain it. A non-blocking unbounded enqueue keeps every emit path lock-safe while still guaranteeing losslessness.

#4069-safety

Unchanged ordering + zero drops means the persistence consumer sees every row event before the watermark event that implies it — exactly as the non-lagged broadcast path already guaranteed. The durable watermark can never outrun its rows.

Changes

  • lib.rs: add persistence_sender/persistence_receiver fields + emit_event.
  • accessors.rs: add take_persistence_receiver() (handed to the consumer once; buffers pre-drain events, so no subscribe-before-publish race).
  • process_block.rs: route all six emit sites through emit_event.
  • event_tests.rs: prove a 5000-event burst is delivered losslessly and in order on the persistence channel while the bounded broadcast lags.

Ordering / #909

This touches key-wallet-manager/src/lib.rs and process_block.rs, which PR #909 (out-of-order spend) also modifies. This branch is independent of #909 and is based on the dev-ancestor rev the downstream build currently pins. There is expected textual overlap in those two files — stacks on #909, merge after #909 and rebase.

Test

cargo test -p key-wallet-manager green (incl. new persistence_channel_is_lossless_under_a_large_burst); cargo check -p dash-spv green; cargo fmt --check clean.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a reliable persistence event stream for wallet activity.
    • Persistence consumers can receive wallet events in sequence, including during high-volume activity.
    • Existing wallet notifications continue to be delivered through the standard channel.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved consistency of event delivery across block processing, synchronization, locking, and mempool operations.
    • Preserved event ordering when multiple wallet updates occur together.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: c43754f0-a063-46c4-86ab-31a0d9c2bff4

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a041f44 and 19622fa.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • key-wallet-manager/src/accessors.rs
  • key-wallet-manager/src/event_tests.rs
  • key-wallet-manager/src/lib.rs
  • key-wallet-manager/src/process_block.rs
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • key-wallet-manager/src/process_block.rs
  • key-wallet-manager/src/event_tests.rs
  • key-wallet-manager/src/accessors.rs

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The PR adds an optional unbounded persistence event channel. Wallet events now use centralized dual-channel emission. Processing paths retain event order. A regression test verifies lossless persistence delivery during a 5,000-event burst.

Changes

Persistence event delivery

Layer / File(s) Summary
Persistence channel contract
key-wallet-manager/src/accessors.rs, key-wallet-manager/src/lib.rs
WalletManager lazily creates an unbounded persistence channel and exposes take_persistence_receiver. The receiver can be taken only once.
Centralized event emission
key-wallet-manager/src/lib.rs, key-wallet-manager/src/process_block.rs
emit_event sends cloned events to persistence consumers and forwards the original event through the bounded broadcast channel. Wallet processing paths use this method, including chain-lock processing.
Burst delivery validation
key-wallet-manager/src/event_tests.rs
The async test verifies ordered delivery of 5,000 persistence events and confirms lag on the bounded broadcast channel.

Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~20 minutes

Suggested labels: ready-for-review

Suggested reviewers: xdustinface, quantumexplorer

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
  participant ProcessBlock
  participant WalletManager
  participant PersistenceReceiver
  participant BroadcastReceiver
  ProcessBlock->>WalletManager: emit_event(WalletEvent)
  WalletManager->>PersistenceReceiver: send cloned event
  WalletManager->>BroadcastReceiver: broadcast original event
Loading
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly identifies the key-wallet-manager fix and its purpose: adding a lossless persistence event channel to prevent the sync-watermark freeze.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@key-wallet-manager/src/lib.rs`:
- Around line 201-210: Update WalletManager::emit_event to handle a closed
persistence_sender instead of ignoring its SendError. Propagate the delivery
failure through the existing thiserror error type, or transition to a terminal
sync-failure state that prevents subsequent in-memory state advancement;
preserve normal fan-out behavior for event_sender.
- Around line 153-173: Update WalletManager::new, persistence_receiver
initialization, and take_persistence_receiver so an unbounded persistence queue
is not created or retained unless a draining consumer is installed and
supervised before event emission. Ensure emit_event cannot enqueue indefinitely
when no consumer exists, while preserving the existing persistence delivery
behavior for configured consumers and updating affected construction paths
accordingly.
🪄 Autofix

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 78213015-5688-4316-a31e-198e7ad6fd44

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9cbe4e7 and baf975f.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • key-wallet-manager/src/accessors.rs
  • key-wallet-manager/src/event_tests.rs
  • key-wallet-manager/src/lib.rs
  • key-wallet-manager/src/process_block.rs

Comment thread key-wallet-manager/src/lib.rs Outdated
Comment thread key-wallet-manager/src/lib.rs
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 89.65517% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 74.99%. Comparing base (a041f44) to head (19622fa).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
key-wallet-manager/src/lib.rs 84.61% 2 Missing ⚠️
key-wallet-manager/src/accessors.rs 87.50% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev     #924      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   75.00%   74.99%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         328      328              
  Lines       77228    77253      +25     
==========================================
+ Hits        57925    57938      +13     
- Misses      19303    19315      +12     
Flag Coverage Δ
core 77.29% <ø> (ø)
ffi 50.15% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
rpc 20.00% <ø> (ø)
spv 91.26% <ø> (-0.04%) ⬇️
wallet 75.74% <89.65%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
key-wallet-manager/src/process_block.rs 90.61% <100.00%> (+0.08%) ⬆️
key-wallet-manager/src/accessors.rs 57.98% <87.50%> (-0.40%) ⬇️
key-wallet-manager/src/lib.rs 75.25% <84.61%> (+0.42%) ⬆️

... and 7 files with indirect coverage changes

bfoss765 and others added 8 commits August 5, 2026 01:15
…efore-funding (dashpay#649)

A spend processed BEFORE the transaction that funded the UTXO it spends
(out-of-order block delivery during a cold rescan) leaves that UTXO
permanently in the wallet's tracked set, producing phantom spendable
balance.

Device evidence (testnet): output
2febe5d7e8ad1dd0fb633004a82a24783d9b2e9095883541576e5f1344eb9975:0
(1,000,000 duffs) is counted unspent by the SDK while dashj has it spent,
and the phantom +0.01 survives a full wallet rebuild from seed (fresh
re-derivation + rescan reproduces it deterministically), proving the miss
lives in the scan/processing path, not just live mempool ingestion.

This test models that scenario at the WalletManager level: fund 1,000,000
duffs to a wallet address, then deliver the spending block (height 200)
BEFORE the funding block (height 100). It asserts the funding outpoint is
NOT still tracked afterward. FAILS on the current pin (which already
contains dashpay#837/dashpay#864/dashpay#891/dashpay#893) — those do not address this defect.

Refs: dashpay#649

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ashpay#649

Root cause: the "already spent" guard in
managed_core_funds_account.rs::update_utxos keys off the ACCOUNT-LOCAL
`spent_outpoints` set, which is only populated when the account itself
processes the spending transaction. When a spend is delivered before its
funding tx (out-of-order rescan), the wallet does not yet own the input,
so the spend is classified as irrelevant, update_utxos never runs for it,
and nothing records the spend. When the funding tx is processed later, the
output is (re-)inserted as a fresh, spendable UTXO -> phantom balance that
survives a full from-seed rescan.

Fix (adapted from dashpay#851): record every spend observed
in a block into a new wallet-level `observed_spent_outpoints` map
(ManagedWalletInfo), independent of the spending tx's classification or
account attribution. update_utxos and record_transaction consult this map:

  - update_utxos skips any output already observed spent (spend-first
    ordering: funding arrives after the spend).
  - remove_spent_from_accounts drops a coin the matched-account path
    missed (funding-first ordering: spend routed to another account).
  - TransactionRecord::compensate_for_observed_spends keeps net_amount /
    output_details consistent with the observed spend (declarative, so
    it is idempotent across rescan replays).

The set is bounded-permanent: entries are evicted by
prune_finalized_observed_spends once the spend height is provably final
(<= min(chainlock height, synced_height)); add-account rewinds the sync
checkpoint so a late account gets filter coverage before pruning can run.
A dash-spv commit-time contiguity guard keeps a mid-flight account-add
rescan from being silently clobbered forward.

Also fixes AddressPool::prune_unused to clear script_pubkey_index
alongside address_index.

Adds manager-level regression tests (multi-wallet, large-block stress)
that exercise the fix through the public WalletManager API.

The repro test from the previous commit now passes; key-wallet (549),
key-wallet-manager (all) and dash-spv lib (482) suites are green. The
pre-existing masternode-network integration failures
(test_utils/masternode_network.rs:106) are unrelated and fail identically
on the clean pin.

Refs: dashpay#649
Adapted-from: dashpay#851

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…patch coverage

Codecov flagged the dashpay#649 fix's previously-uncovered branches: the wallet-level
`observed_spent_outpoints` serde adapter, finality-boundary pruning, the
funding-first removal guard, the account-add sync rewind, and the AddressPool
`script_pubkey_index` prune fix. The manager-level integration tests only drive
the spend-first ordering end-to-end, leaving these reachable only from the
crate-internal `pub(crate)` surface.

Add `key-wallet/src/tests/observed_spent_outpoints_tests.rs` (the sibling file
already referenced by observed_spent_large_block_stress_test.rs) with five
white-box tests, plus one AddressPool prune test:

  - observed_spent_outpoints_survive_serde_round_trip: exercises the
    (OutPoint, height) sequence serde adapter (serialize + deserialize visitor)
    and the empty-map / `#[serde(default)]` path, isolated on an account-less
    wallet so the populated-account `script_pubkey_index` JSON-key blocker does
    not apply.
  - prune_finalized_observed_spends_respects_finality_boundary: no-op without a
    chainlock; otherwise evicts exactly entries at/below
    min(chainlock height, synced_height), keeping the rescan case (chainlock
    above sync checkpoint) from over-pruning.
  - funding_first_guard_removes_held_coin_and_compensates_record: the un-gated
    remove_spent_from_accounts / finalize_guard_removed_utxo path — coin dropped,
    reservation released, funding record compensated to net 0; idempotent;
    coinbase skipped.
  - wallet_level_set_outlives_account_local_reload: the account-local
    spent_outpoints derived set (rebuilt from recorded txs via
    simulate_reload_rebuild_spent_outpoints) forgets an unrecorded spend, but the
    persisted wallet-level set still prevents resurrection on funding re-delivery.
  - adding_account_from_xpub_rewinds_sync_checkpoint: standalone-account add
    collapses synced_height to birth_height - 1; a still-behind checkpoint is
    left untouched.
  - prune_unused_clears_script_pubkey_index (address_pool_tests.rs): regression
    guard for the missing script_pubkey_index.remove in AddressPool::prune_unused.

key-wallet lib (554) and key-wallet-manager (all) suites green.

Refs: dashpay#649

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… modification, tighten deser cap

- compensate_for_observed_spends: only replace the match-derived net_amount
  when the compensation actually dropped an output detail, keeping the
  no-observed-spend path byte-identical to pre-dashpay#649 behavior; pinned by a
  new unit test.
- record_observed_spends: report whether the persisted observed-spent map
  actually changed, and surface that as state_modified in
  check_core_transaction — a consumer persisting only on reported
  modifications must not lose a recorded spend across a restart; pinned by
  a new regression test (new spend reports, unchanged redelivery and
  mempool spends do not).
- Replace a comment reference to a nonexistent test with the inline
  rationale for why input_details and account_match.sent populate together.
- Tighten MAX_OBSERVED_SPENT_OUTPOINTS 10M -> 1M (load-time allocation cap
  from a few hundred MB to a few tens of MB), still far above any
  legitimate size.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…urface guard-rewritten records, restore public account API

Addresses three external review findings on top of PR dashpay#909:

1. [P1] The commit-time contiguity guard could still certify unscanned
   coverage for a newly added account: a rewind landing INSIDE a scanned
   batch's range passed the height check, and an account add that moved
   no heights (checkpoint already at the birth floor) was undetectable
   by any height comparison. ManagedWalletInfo now carries an in-memory
   account_generation counter bumped on every account add (even
   height-invisible ones); filter scan snapshots it per wallet and
   commit refuses to advance a wallet whose generation changed since
   scan. Pinned by three new dash-spv tests including the mid-batch
   rewind repro (9000 -> scan [5000..9999] -> rewind 7499 -> commit
   keeps 7499) and the unmoved-checkpoint case.

2. [P2] The funding-first guard rewrote funding records without ever
   surfacing them: remove_spent_from_accounts now returns
   post-compensation clones of every rewritten record, the checker adds
   them to updated_records on both the relevant and irrelevant paths,
   and the manager propagates updated_records independent of
   is_relevant, so consumers persisting per-record updates see the
   rewrite.

3. [P2] ManagedAccountRefMut::record_transaction/confirm_transaction had
   silently gone pub -> pub(crate) with changed signatures. The public
   methods are restored with their original signatures (recording with
   no observed-spend context, the pre-dashpay#649 behavior); the checker uses
   new pub(crate) *_with_observed_spends variants.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… history (dashpay#649/dashpay#846)

HashEngineering reported (against dashpay#851/dashpay#866) that a funding transaction
recovered after its spend was already observed -- every wallet-relevant
output already in observed_spent_outpoints before the funding is applied --
was dropped from history entirely: the spend-first path made it come out
not-relevant, so no TransactionRecord and no detection event were produced,
while balance and UTXO set stayed exact. That record-loss "belongs in dashpay#851";
dashpay#851 is superseded by dashpay#909.

Investigation of dashpay#909 shows its core commit (ebcd40a) already implements the
suggested remedy, so no behavior change is needed:

  - relevance in check_transaction_for_match is address-membership based and
    is never gated on spent-status, so a fully-spent funding tx is still
    classified relevant;
  - ManagedCoreFundsAccount::record_transaction unconditionally inserts the
    record after TransactionRecord::compensate_for_observed_spends zeroes the
    already-spent outputs (net 0, no UTXO);
  - the "never insert already-spent value" guard lives in update_utxos (UTXO
    insertion only), not in recording.

The QuantumExplorer "surface updated records independent of relevance" review
fix covers the separate funding-first UPDATE case (remove_spent_from_accounts
rewriting an existing funding record); the born-fully-spent NEW-record
insertion is covered independently by the record_transaction compensate path.

The existing observed-spent tests assert only UTXO/balance, leaving the
history-record guarantee uncovered. This adds that coverage: two tests pin
that a born-fully-spent recovered tx -- a plain funding tx, and a CoinJoin-
style intermediate hop that spends a live coin -- is surfaced as a new record
and recorded in the account's transaction history, while balance and UTXOs
stay at zero. Verified across InBlock and InChainLockedBlock (chainlocked
recovery) contexts and the WalletManager block path during investigation.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… job passes

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…elper

CodeRabbit: the shared `spend_tx` helper hardcoded `Address::dummy(Network::Testnet, ..)`,
forcing every observed-spend test onto Testnet (coding guideline: never hardcode
network parameters in a shared helper). Add a `network: Network` parameter and
thread it into `Address::dummy`; each caller passes the network its manager uses.

All key-wallet-manager tests pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Note

GitHub couldn't provide a complete incremental comparison for this pull request, so CodeRabbit is performing a full review instead. This review may take a little longer.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@key-wallet-manager/src/lib.rs`:
- Around line 153-174: Replace the unbounded persistence channel represented by
WalletManager::persistence_sender with a bounded handoff, and refactor
emit_event and its callers so persistence projection occurs outside the manager
write-lock lifetime before applying backpressure. Define explicit behavior when
the bounded queue is full, such as awaiting delivery or using the established
durable recovery path, while preserving take_persistence_receiver’s opt-in
contract and handling persistence_consumer_lost without allowing unbounded event
growth.
🪄 Autofix

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 4d2dc67e-7f18-4c97-9b6e-59c650c3434a

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9cbe4e7 and 3af163f.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • key-wallet-manager/src/accessors.rs
  • key-wallet-manager/src/event_tests.rs
  • key-wallet-manager/src/lib.rs
  • key-wallet-manager/src/process_block.rs
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • key-wallet-manager/src/event_tests.rs
  • key-wallet-manager/src/process_block.rs

Comment thread key-wallet-manager/src/lib.rs
…d-spend mechanism

Applies ZocoLini's requested simplification (PR dashpay#909 review): the dashpay#649
out-of-order-spend fix is the two-piece mechanism only —

  (a) record every input seen in a block-context tx into
      `observed_spent_outpoints`, independent of classification
      (`wallet_checker.rs`), and
  (b) in `update_utxos`, skip inserting an output whose outpoint is already
      in that map (`managed_core_funds_account.rs`).

Removes the separate unattributable-spend compensation machinery that was
bundled in, which also made transaction history order-dependent (a receive
delivered before its spend was rewritten to a 0-value entry, erasing it from
history — a spend delivered first leaves it intact):

- `TransactionRecord::compensate_for_observed_spends` and its unit tests
- `ManagedWalletInfo::remove_spent_from_accounts` (both call sites in
  `check_core_transaction`) and its `finalize_guard_removed_utxo` helper
- the now-dead account-local helpers `mark_outpoint_spent`,
  `release_reservation_for`, and the test-only
  `simulate_reload_rebuild_spent_outpoints`
- the `updated_records`-independent-of-relevance change in
  `WalletManager` (its only source was the removed funding-first guard)

The `record_transaction_with_observed_spends` / `confirm_transaction_with_observed_spends`
pair is kept: it is the plumbing that delivers the wallet-level observed map to
`update_utxos`, i.e. piece (b) itself.

A born-fully-spent funding tx is still recorded in history; its already-spent
output is simply never (re-)tracked as a UTXO (balance/UTXO correctness comes
from piece (b), not from rewriting the record). Tests updated to pin that the
receive is preserved in history rather than erased.

Test-helper cleanup (`key-wallet-manager/tests/common/mod.rs`): drop the
superfluous `Network` parameter from `spend_tx` (every caller passed Testnet and
the payee's network is irrelevant to observed-spend logic) and build the external
payee script directly, so the helper needs no network at all.

All three observed-spend integration tests (incl. the deterministic repro) and
`cargo test -p key-wallet --lib` pass; workspace clippy (`-D warnings`, debug +
release) and rustfmt are clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@bfoss765
bfoss765 force-pushed the fix/wallet-event-persistence-mpsc branch from d7fe2ec to 58be4d7 Compare August 5, 2026 15:20
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Note

GitHub couldn't provide a complete incremental comparison for this pull request, so CodeRabbit is performing a full review instead. This review may take a little longer.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
key-wallet/src/tests/mod.rs (1)

25-25: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🔵 Trivial | ⚡ Quick win

Consider placing the new tests in spent_outpoints_tests.rs.

The path instructions enumerate the unit-test module files for key-wallet/src/tests/, and observed_spent_outpoints_tests.rs is not in that list. spent_outpoints_tests.rs already exists as the listed module for spent-outpoint behavior.

If the observed-spend cases are intentionally kept separate from the existing spent-outpoint cases, keep the new module and update the organization list instead. Otherwise, move the tests into spent_outpoints_tests.rs.

As per path instructions: "Organize unit tests by functionality into separate test modules: account_tests.rs, address_pool_tests.rs, transaction_tests.rs, wallet_tests.rs, integration_tests.rs, balance_tests.rs, spent_outpoints_tests.rs, ...".

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@key-wallet/src/tests/mod.rs` at line 25, Organize the observed-spend tests
with the existing spent-outpoint tests by moving the contents of
observed_spent_outpoints_tests.rs into spent_outpoints_tests.rs and removing its
module declaration from the tests module. If separation is required, retain the
module and update the test organization list to include it.

Source: Path instructions

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@key-wallet-manager/tests/out_of_order_spend_repro_test.rs`:
- Line 40: Rename the test function
spend_processed_before_its_funding_tx_leaves_utxo_permanently_tracked to reflect
the asserted invariant that the UTXO is not still tracked after the flow
completes. Update only the test name in out_of_order_spend_repro_test.rs,
keeping the existing spend_processed_before_its_funding_tx scenario and the
!still_tracked assertion unchanged so the test name matches the expected
behavior.

In `@key-wallet/src/transaction_checking/wallet_checker.rs`:
- Around line 63-83: The observed-spend insertion in the wallet-checking flow
must be persisted independently of transaction relevance. Update the FFI
result/return path to expose and honor result.state_modified, including when
is_relevant is false, or make observed_spent_outpoints durable immediately
within record_observed_spends; ensure unrelated blocked spends survive restart.

---

Nitpick comments:
In `@key-wallet/src/tests/mod.rs`:
- Line 25: Organize the observed-spend tests with the existing spent-outpoint
tests by moving the contents of observed_spent_outpoints_tests.rs into
spent_outpoints_tests.rs and removing its module declaration from the tests
module. If separation is required, retain the module and update the test
organization list to include it.
🪄 Autofix

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: bc2fdd65-f467-42ec-8e6a-1f38978342fa

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8f78baa and 58be4d7.

📒 Files selected for processing (22)
  • dash-spv/src/sync/filters/batch.rs
  • dash-spv/src/sync/filters/manager.rs
  • key-wallet-manager/src/accessors.rs
  • key-wallet-manager/src/event_tests.rs
  • key-wallet-manager/src/lib.rs
  • key-wallet-manager/src/process_block.rs
  • key-wallet-manager/src/test_utils/mock_wallet.rs
  • key-wallet-manager/src/wallet_interface.rs
  • key-wallet-manager/tests/common/mod.rs
  • key-wallet-manager/tests/observed_spent_large_block_stress_test.rs
  • key-wallet-manager/tests/observed_spent_multi_wallet_test.rs
  • key-wallet-manager/tests/out_of_order_spend_repro_test.rs
  • key-wallet/src/managed_account/address_pool.rs
  • key-wallet/src/managed_account/managed_account_ref.rs
  • key-wallet/src/managed_account/managed_core_funds_account.rs
  • key-wallet/src/tests/address_pool_tests.rs
  • key-wallet/src/tests/mod.rs
  • key-wallet/src/tests/observed_spent_outpoints_tests.rs
  • key-wallet/src/transaction_checking/wallet_checker.rs
  • key-wallet/src/wallet/managed_wallet_info/managed_accounts.rs
  • key-wallet/src/wallet/managed_wallet_info/mod.rs
  • key-wallet/src/wallet/managed_wallet_info/wallet_info_interface.rs
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • key-wallet-manager/src/event_tests.rs
  • key-wallet-manager/src/accessors.rs
  • key-wallet-manager/src/lib.rs

Comment thread key-wallet-manager/tests/out_of_order_spend_repro_test.rs Outdated
Comment thread key-wallet/src/transaction_checking/wallet_checker.rs
bfoss765 and others added 4 commits August 5, 2026 13:02
…iant it pins

The test asserted `!still_tracked` — the funding UTXO must NOT remain in the
tracked set once its spend was observed first — but was named
`..._leaves_utxo_permanently_tracked`, i.e. after the dashpay#649 bug rather than
after the pinned behaviour. A failure therefore read as the expected outcome.
Rename to `..._does_not_leave_utxo_tracked`; assertions and scenario are
unchanged.
…he sync-watermark freeze

The wallet event bus is a single bounded `tokio::broadcast` ring
(`DEFAULT_WALLET_EVENT_CAPACITY` = 1000), fanned out fire-and-forget from
`process_block.rs`. It feeds two very different consumers:

  1. incidental subscribers reached via `subscribe_events()` — dash-spv's
     `EventHandler` dispatch and the unit tests — for which a dropped event
     under overload is harmless; and
  2. the platform durable-persistence consumer, for which a dropped event is
     NOT harmless: the dropped `TransactionDetected`/`BlockProcessed` rows
     never reach disk while the surviving `SyncHeightAdvanced` watermark keeps
     advancing, so the persisted sync height outruns the rows it implies. The
     platform `#4069` guard then latches that wallet's watermark into a
     *permanent* freeze for the rest of the process. In the field this is the
     mainnet sync that climbs, then "rolls back" to a stale height on every
     relaunch.

Under a heavy historical SPV catch-up a burst larger than the ring between
consumer drains overflows it (`RecvError::Lagged`) and trips exactly that
freeze. Batching the persistence stores (shipped earlier) raised the burst
threshold but a single lag still freezes forever.

Fix: give the persistence consumer its own dedicated, unbounded
`tokio::mpsc` channel that carries the same event stream, in the same order,
with no drops — so it can never observe `Lagged` and its freeze guard never
fires. The existing broadcast is kept unchanged for the incidental
subscribers (no behavioural change for dash-spv or tests).

Why unbounded rather than a bounded back-pressuring channel: several emit
sites run inside this manager's `RwLock` write guard (SPV block processing
holds `wallet.write().await` across `process_block_for_wallets`), while the
persistence consumer needs a `read()` lock on the *same* manager to project
each event. A bounded `send().await`/`blocking_send` that parked under the
write guard would deadlock the very consumer that must drain it. A
non-blocking unbounded enqueue keeps every emit path lock-safe while still
guaranteeing losslessness. All emission now flows through a single
`emit_event` choke point that pushes to both channels in order.

`#4069`-safety: unchanged ordering + zero drops means the persistence
consumer sees every row event before the watermark event that implies it,
exactly as the non-lagged broadcast path already guaranteed; the durable
watermark can never outrun its rows.

- lib.rs: add `persistence_sender`/`persistence_receiver` + `emit_event`.
- accessors.rs: add `take_persistence_receiver()` (handed to the consumer once).
- process_block.rs: route all six emit sites through `emit_event`.
- event_tests.rs: prove a 5000-event burst is delivered losslessly and in
  order on the persistence channel while the bounded broadcast lags.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ace a lost consumer

Addresses two CodeRabbit findings on the lossless persistence mpsc:

- Stability & Availability: `WalletManager::new` unconditionally created and
  retained `mpsc::unbounded_channel()`, so a manager whose consumer is never
  installed (only tests call `take_persistence_receiver`) would accumulate every
  emitted event without bound. Make persistence delivery opt-in: the channel is
  now created lazily by `take_persistence_receiver` (the send half is `None`
  until a consumer installs itself), so `emit_event` enqueues nothing when no
  consumer exists. Unbounded + non-blocking is retained for installed consumers,
  which is required: several emit sites run inside the manager's RwLock write
  guard while the consumer needs a read lock to drain, so a bounded blocking send
  would deadlock, and a bounded try_send that dropped would reintroduce the
  watermark freeze (#4069). The documented take-before-emit contract means no
  pre-consumer events are lost.

- Data Integrity: `emit_event` ignored `SendError`. If the installed consumer
  drops its receiver while the manager is still running, durable persistence has
  silently stopped. Surface it: log once (latched) that the consumer was lost. We
  deliberately do not halt in-memory advancement — the manager does not own
  durable state, and on restart the wallet re-scans from the last persisted
  height, so a lost consumer causes no durable corruption.

All key-wallet-manager tests pass, including the lossless-burst persistence test.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…_event

Collapse the hand-wrapped `&&` condition onto one line to satisfy cargo fmt
--check (the pre-commit gate). Formatting only; no behavior change.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@bfoss765
bfoss765 force-pushed the fix/wallet-event-persistence-mpsc branch from 58be4d7 to 2af691b Compare August 5, 2026 17:03
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Note

GitHub couldn't provide a complete incremental comparison for this pull request, so CodeRabbit is performing a full review instead. This review may take a little longer.

@QuantumExplorer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Reviewed in depth (verification details in the successor's description). With #909 merged, the rebase + the one review finding are now in #927 — same three commits with authorship preserved, moved to an in-repo branch, plus the late-install warning (take_persistence_receiver after emission has begun previously missed events silently) and three contract tests pinning the opt-in semantics. Suggest closing this in favor of #927; platform#4315 repins to #927's merge rev once it lands.

🤖 Posted by Claude Code

@bfoss765

bfoss765 commented Aug 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Closing in favor of #927 as suggested. Thanks for carrying the rebase, the late-install warning fix, and the contract tests over with authorship intact. platform#4315 repins to #927's merge rev once it lands.

@bfoss765 bfoss765 closed this Aug 6, 2026
QuantumExplorer pushed a commit to dashpay/platform that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2026
…o the watermark can't freeze

Root-cause follow-up to the batching + sync_fault commits on this branch.
Batching raised the burst threshold but a single `broadcast::Lagged` still
froze a wallet's durable sync watermark permanently (#4069).

The producer (dashpay/rust-dashcore#924) now offers a dedicated, unbounded
`mpsc` persistence channel alongside its lossy broadcast. This switches the
consumer onto it:

- core_bridge.rs: `spawn_/run_wallet_event_adapter` take
  `mpsc::UnboundedReceiver<WalletEvent>` instead of `broadcast::Receiver`.
  The batched `try_recv` fold is kept verbatim; the `Lagged`/`missed`/global
  `fault_all` path is removed because an unbounded channel can never lag.
  `AdapterFaultState` keeps only the per-wallet store-rejection freeze as a
  fail-closed backstop (never fires in a healthy run).
- manager/mod.rs: take the receiver via `take_persistence_receiver()` instead
  of `subscribe_events()`. Unlike a broadcast receiver, the mpsc buffers
  events emitted before the task's first poll, so there is no
  subscribe-before-publish race.
- Diagnostics via the `log` facade (android_logger forwards `log` to logcat;
  `tracing` may not — see rs-unified-sdk-jni JNI_OnLoad): one
  `log::info!("wallet-event batch: folded=.. wallets=.. synced_height_persisted=.. faulted=.. missed=0")`
  per drain, and a one-shot `log::error!("SYNC WATERMARK FROZEN ...")` if the
  per-wallet freeze ever latches — so the next tester logcat is unambiguous
  about whether the watermark is advancing.
- Cargo.toml: re-pin key-wallet-manager (and the sibling rust-dashcore crates,
  kept consistent to avoid a duplicate-crate type mismatch) to the fork rev
  carrying #924.

reaches the persister before the `SyncHeightAdvanced` watermark that implies
it — the durable watermark can never outrun its rows. The freeze guard stays
as a backstop but should now never fire.

Tests: broadcast-driven adapter tests ported to the mpsc; the `Lagged` test is
replaced by `lossless_burst_never_freezes_and_watermark_reaches_tip` (a
3000-event burst — 3× the old ring — advances the watermark to the tip with no
freeze). `cargo test -p platform-wallet` (531) and `-p platform-wallet-ffi`
(224) green.

Stacked on the batching + sync_fault commits (#4289).
Requires dashpay/rust-dashcore#924 (producer) to land.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants