feat: Support duration type in approx_distinct#23291
Merged
Merged
Conversation
4749a7d to
87049df
Compare
87049df to
98a25ce
Compare
Jefffrey
reviewed
Jul 3, 2026
Jefffrey
approved these changes
Jul 6, 2026
Contributor
|
thanks @mkleen |
Contributor
Author
|
@Jefffrey Thanks for the review! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
approx_distinctfunction #22989 but does not close it. More types are coming.Rationale for this change
Durationtype forapprox_distinctDurationcan be directly supported forNumericHLLAccumulatorandHllGroupsAccumulatorWhat changes are included in this PR?
NumericHLLAccumulatorandHllGroupsAccumulatorto supportDurationaggregate.sltAre these changes tested?
Yes
Are there any user-facing changes?
Yes,
approx_distinctsupports nowDurationbut no breaking changes.