Bug template update as per alkemio/product#2015

[bobbykolev]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated the bug report template with the appropriate labels and a dedicated “Bug” issue type.

[github-actions]

📊 PR Metrics Summary

Title: Bug template update as per alkemio/product#2015
Total LOC Changed: 3
Files Changed: 1
Proposed Review Type: LLM_ONLY
Rationale:

• simple_change
• LOC=3
• files=1
• no_high_risk_flags

Flags

No risk flags detected

Thresholds

{
  "critical_loc": 200,
  "simple_loc": 100,
  "file_count": 10
}

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 928e277d-968d-4f19-92fa-1c84c8058cd5

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 74594fd and 8246b69.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md

Included review availability: 3 reviews are currently available. Your included PR review attempts over the past 7 days set your current allowance at 4 reviews per hour.

---

Walkthrough

The bug report template removes the default bug label and adds the Bug issue type. The assignee remains empty.

Changes

Bug report template

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Update bug report metadata .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md	The template default labels now exclude bug, and the issue type is set to Bug. The assignee remains empty.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Suggested reviewers: valentinyanakiev

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 8246b

This localized template-only change introduces no actionable merge-blocking risk and is merge-ready after normal checks and review.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly identifies the update to the bug report template and references the related product issue.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch template-update

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[hero101]

does the label harm in some way?