Skip to content

WIP: privilege check when adding a space to an innovation hub #6003

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
techsmyth wants to merge 2 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
+176 −0
Draft

WIP: privilege check when adding a space to an innovation hub #6003

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
f06c707
spec for privilege check when adding a space to a hub
techsmyth Apr 24, 2026
de4ca48
Merge branch 'develop' into 087-hub-invitation-privilege
antst May 28, 2026
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
37 changes: 37 additions & 0 deletions specs/087-hub-invitation-privilege/checklists/requirements.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
# Specification Quality Checklist: Space-Side Privilege for Accepting Innovation Hub Invitations

**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
**Created**: 2026-04-24
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)

## Content Quality

- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
- [x] All mandatory sections completed

## Requirement Completeness

- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [x] Edge cases are identified
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified

## Feature Readiness

- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification

## Notes

- Initial validation passed on first iteration (2026-04-24).
- Revised 2026-04-24 to split the hub-membership mutation surface: the generic update action no longer accepts the space list, and dedicated add/remove actions are introduced. This is structurally necessary — otherwise the new space-side privilege check can be bypassed in a single update call. Re-validated after the revision; all items still pass.
- Open scope decisions documented as explicit assumptions rather than `[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]` markers: (a) removal uses existing hub-side authorization only (no symmetric space-side consent on remove), (b) filter-based hub inclusion is out of scope for the new check, (c) clients currently writing the space list via the generic update action will need to migrate.
- Ready for `/speckit.clarify` (optional) or `/speckit.plan`.
Loading
Loading