-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
Rework LiveActivity push stats: broadcasts as apnsLiveActivity, push-to-start as apnsPushToStart #350
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
JoaoDiasAbly
wants to merge
1
commit into
main
Choose a base branch
from
liveactivity-stats-pushtostart
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Rework LiveActivity push stats: broadcasts as apnsLiveActivity, push-to-start as apnsPushToStart #350
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why make this distinction?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Because I think otherwise we'd make the existing total inaccurate:
Since the fanout for these broadcast is at the Apple's side and as stated in ADR-159 we don't have visibility into those broadcasts, we can't accurately say how many devices received it, which would be the correct value to increment in the existing total. So I think it makes sense to track how many broadcasts we issued and I think it's a complete different stat.
Wdyt?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that's one way to interpret it, but "device" is not mentioned in either the stat name or the description, and I think it's actually more confusing that
totalisn't the total of the individually labelled stats.If we want "device push" and "broadcast push" to be separated, I think we should make that more explicit (e.g. put the LiveActivity stats under
push.broadcasts.xxx), but to be honest I think these legacy stats are already pretty confusing, and so perhaps do what you think is reasonable here and we should do this better in the (as yet unreleased) labelled stats.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fair, I can adjust the description if you think it's worth it
yeah I would prefer to not change things again and go "against" the legacy stats structure - do you agree we leave it like this now, which I think works fine even though it might still not be too obvious to the user but I don't think we can do better while adhering to the legacy stats structure - and try to improve later with labelled stats?