docs: scope OpenShell 0.0.71 review link to openclaw and hermes

[RUSHcitizen]

Summary

Fixes a broken link that 404s for Deep Agents readers on the OpenShell 0.0.72 compatibility review page.

The page renders in the openclaw, hermes, and deepagents variants and links to the OpenShell 0.0.71 gateway authentication review. That review page is intentionally scoped to openclaw and hermes only. Its content is specific to those agents (Hermes env-file secret boundaries and the OpenClaw gateway-runtime API) and it was deliberately left out of the deepagents nav when the variant was added. A later scoped PR (#6606) added only the 0.0.72 review to the deepagents nav and included a regression test asserting that scoping, so adding 0.0.71 to the deepagents nav would contradict a prior decision and break that test.

Instead of forcing the 0.0.71 page into the deepagents nav, this scopes the link itself. The sentence is wrapped in AgentOnly variant="openclaw,hermes" so those readers keep the working link, and a parallel AgentOnly variant="deepagents" block carries the same sentence as plain text so Deep Agents readers still get the information without a dead link. This follows the existing convention in docs/manage-sandboxes/run-sandboxes.mdx.

Test plan

npx vitest run test/agent-variant-docs.test.ts passes (13 tests).
npm run docs builds with 0 errors. Verified the generated output: openclaw and hermes keep the link, deepagents renders the plain-text sentence with no broken link.

Signed-off-by: Atharv Kumaria kumariaaatharv@gmail.com

[copy-pr-bot]

This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.

Pull request vetters can view their responsibilities here.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The compatibility review updates the gateway authentication statement to render separate AgentOnly variants for openclaw,hermes and deepagents, preserving the existing 0.0.71 review reference.

Changes

Gateway authentication documentation

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Conditional authentication contract text docs/security/openshell-0.0.72-compatibility-review.mdx	The unconditional gateway authentication statement is replaced with variant-specific AgentOnly blocks for openclaw,hermes and deepagents.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• NVIDIA/NemoClaw#7134: Related AgentOnly directive and variant-handling documentation changes.

Suggested labels: area: security, integration: openclaw, integration: hermes

Suggested reviewers: cv

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly describes scoping the OpenShell 0.0.71 review link to OpenClaw and Hermes, which matches the doc change.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[github-actions]

PR Review Advisor — Informational

Advisor assessment: Informational / high confidence
Next action: No advisor follow-up needed.
Findings: 0 blockers · 0 warnings · 0 suggestions
Status: No actionable findings remain in the canonical review ledger.

Model lanes

• GPT-5.6 Terra (primary): Completed · high confidence · 0 blockers · 0 warnings · 0 suggestions
• Nemotron 3 Ultra (second opinion): Completed · high confidence · 0 blockers · 0 warnings · 0 suggestions
• Model comparison: normalized findings match; normalized E2E selections match; severity counts match.

Nemotron output stays in workflow artifacts and does not change the assessment above.

E2E guidance

Advisory only. E2E / PR Gate selects and runs jobs independently.

Recommended E2E: None

Workflow run details

This automated review informs maintainers. Warnings and suggestions do not require a response. A maintainer decides whether to merge.