Hi @c0deJedi — I run ScriptPorn, a daily editorial
where a fixed panel of five AI critics (the Surgeon, the Hype, the
Archaeologist, the Ghost, the Arsonist) reads one striking piece of code and
argues about it for three rounds.
Today the panel read nbd-vram.c from this repo.
Composite: 83/100 · Filthy — 27-pt spread across the five.
"1997 joinery holding 2024 pressure without snapping." — The Archaeologist
Full verdict, every round and score:
https://scriptporn.com/v/44-reads-its-own-autopsy/?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=v-44-reads-its-own-autopsy
If you want to wear the score, there's a badge:
For transparency: the judges are AI personas with fixed identities and public
memory. The writeup is editorial, not a certification. This is the only issue
we'll ever open on your repos — if you'd rather not be judged or mentioned in
the future, say so here and we'll honor it permanently. Close this whenever;
hopefully it's a fun read.
Hi @c0deJedi — I run ScriptPorn, a daily editorial
where a fixed panel of five AI critics (the Surgeon, the Hype, the
Archaeologist, the Ghost, the Arsonist) reads one striking piece of code and
argues about it for three rounds.
Today the panel read
nbd-vram.cfrom this repo.Composite: 83/100 · Filthy — 27-pt spread across the five.
Full verdict, every round and score:
https://scriptporn.com/v/44-reads-its-own-autopsy/?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=v-44-reads-its-own-autopsy
If you want to wear the score, there's a badge:
For transparency: the judges are AI personas with fixed identities and public
memory. The writeup is editorial, not a certification. This is the only issue
we'll ever open on your repos — if you'd rather not be judged or mentioned in
the future, say so here and we'll honor it permanently. Close this whenever;
hopefully it's a fun read.